Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP Financials - Financial Supply Chain Management
Viewing all 217 articles
Browse latest View live

Need a brief explanation in Documented Credit Decision (DCD) on Open Credit Amount

$
0
0

Dear experts,

 

Understood that in the DCD, the blocked sales order value which will be taken into credit check would be the "checked credit value" instead of the "open credit amount", however when report back into the AR, it will show the "open credit amount" instead of the other. Can someone kindly advise me?

dcd1.pngdcd2.png

 

Thanks & best regards,

Alex


Biller Direct Payments not updating in ECC FBL5N

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are facing an issue that the payments made in Biller Direct Portal not reflecting in ECC FBL5N.

 

Still the Customer invoices Showing as Open Items.

 

But, When I try to pay those invoices Manually through F-28 the amount is showing in unassigned status.

 

I have documented the details of the issue and attached below.

 

appreciate your help on this issue.

 

Thanks

 

Vijaya kumar

Error when creating destination BGRFC_SUPERVISOR: ACCES to entry /RFC/BGRFC_SUPERVISOR in the secure storage denied.

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I am configuring FSCM in ERP 6.0 NW 7.40 SP09 and did below steps with DDIC user in client 000 and customer client and stuck on one of the step of creating SUPERVISOR_DESTINATION in T code SBGRFCCONF.

 

I have created its user S_<SID>_<000> with Role SAP_BC_BGRFC_SUPERVISOR automatically assigned to it.

 

Error : Error when creating destination BGRFC_SUPERVISOR: ACCES to entry /RFC/BGRFC_SUPERVISOR in the secure storage denied.

 

1. Run Report : SRT_ADMIN : created user SAP_WSRT and made SOAP Runtime setting.

2. Run Report : SRT_ADMIN_CHECK

 

SAP_ALL profile was assigned to both user DDIC and S_<SID_<000> as well. Also below Roles assigned to user SAP_WSRT.

 

SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_ADMIN

SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_SERVICE_USER

SAP_FIN_FSCM_CR_USER

SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER

 

So there is no authorization issue as such.

 

Also SECSTORE has all green entries.

 

Your help will be appreciated !!!

 

Thanks and Regards,

Anand

Item category 40100 not allowed in accounting transaction 0200/0001

$
0
0

HI

         I getting the error while posting the transaction f-28

 

 

 

Item category 40100 not allowed in accounting transaction 0200/0001

 

Regards

 

ALI

Acct determination not defined for trans. SKT in chart of accts 9001

$
0
0

HI

 

   i getting the error while posting the f-28 plz suggested me.

Acct determination not defined for trans. SKT in chart of accts 9001

 

Regards

 

ALI

Missing Customizing menu for Documented Credit Decision

$
0
0

Hi guys,

 

I am having a look of the functionality for DCD in FSCM, according to the documentation there should be a customizing menu under Credit Risk Monitoring ==> Documented Credit Decision for this purpose. However I do not find it there.

So far I have already activated the methods SET_ACTIVE and DCD_ACTIVATE in the BADI UKM_R3_ACTIVATE, and the Implementation UKM_SD_FSCM_INTEGR1 for the BADI "BADI_SD_CM".

 

Is there any other system dependence or setting, so this custmizing oprtion is available?

 

Best
and thanks for your feedbacks

 

Juan C.

Division wise credit management through FSCM

$
0
0

Hi

 

Is it possible to have division wise credit management using FSCM. We have one company code under this there are multiple division. we would like to have credit controls division specific?

 

Pls. help

 

Thanks

SAP FSCM - Credit Limit Check

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

We have relationships maintained in the BP for the Higher and Lower Level, in general when sales order gets created for this combination the limit will be  checked overall and utilized accordingly. in case if the overall limit is fully Utilized then the sales order will be blocked but


We have requirement to block the sales order in case any overdue exist for  any one BP for the above combination , irrespective of higher or lower level relationship. The Sales order should get blocked inspite of the overall limit still available for that relationship combination.

 

As per the below example inspite of 8L overall limit exist as on 02.12.2015 still the sales order should get Blocked as there is an overdue for one of the relationship BP i.e BP1B as on 01.12.2015

 

For Ex:

Business Partner

Credit Limit

Sales Orders Created with the payment  01/12/2015

Payment Cleared as on 01.12.2015

Sales Order created as on 02/12/2015

BP1 – Higher Level

5L

5L

5L

1L using BP1 -  this should block as there is a Overdue item in this relation inspite of 8L overall Limit still exist

BP1A – Lower Level

2L

2L

2L

 

BP1B – Lower Level

3L

1L

Over Due

 

BP1C – lower Level

1L

1L

1L

50 Thousand using BP1C : This also should block as there is a Overdue item in this relation inspite of 8L overall Limit still exist

Total

11L

 

 

 

 

Regards,

Reenu John


Liability totals - UKM_TOTALS

$
0
0

Hello,

 

Does anyone know in what situations column "Hedged" (AMOUNT_SEC) in table UKM_TOTALS gets updated?

 

Thanks in advance,

Margarida Magalhães

Transaction data not updating from SAP R/3 to FSCM.

$
0
0

Hi Guys,

I am working on ECC 6.0 environment, where in FSCM credit management implemented without XI and WS-RM. I have an issue, when customer got posted with sales order/ delivery / invoice, the same was getting reflected inFD32, but not updating fields Credit Exposure and Utilisation  in BP-credit segment data-Credit limit and control .

I have done necessary configurations in  OVA8 and relevant configurations/activated BAdis relevant to Credit Management.

Please suggest .

Regards,

Malli

Automatic update of BP commitments

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have some doubts concerning the commitments updates in the Business Partner. After checking some SAP manuals we have understood that it is importante to run UKM_COMMITMENTS, UKM_TRANSFER_ITEMS and UKM_RVKRED77 to update the commitments.

After some tests we have concluded that credit exposure type 100 and 400 are automatically updated when creating sales orders and deliveries. However, when creating billing documents exposures are not automatically updated and it is necessary to run UKM_TRANSFER_ITEMS.
So should all these programs be set and background jobs that run periodically? Or some of them are used only when there are some problems in the commitments update? In which situations are commitments updated automatically and in which aren't and it is importante to run the programs/ transactions indicated above?

 

Thanks in advance,

Margarida Magalhães

IHC F9K3 - turnover list

$
0
0

Hi, I am trying to display turnover list but unable to display the items. After I enter the Posting Date range I am not able to see any items in the turnover list. I see the message as below: Number of Records Not Included Due to authorization: 6 Can anyone tell me what authorization is needed to display turnovers in F9K3? thanks, raj

Integration SAP-PayPal

$
0
0

I am SAP consultant in a multinational company.

 

We want to integrate SAP with Paypal to make payments because most of our vendors only are using paypal account, and we want to give them a second choice to receive our payments.

 

We have heard and read something related to XiPAy, that links SAP to Paypal to make payments.

 

Regarding to Master Data we have clear that we will have to create another field called "Paypal Id" where we will have to write the email account related to the paypal account and select as sensitive in case it changes. As well we will have to control that when a Payment method Paypal (We will customize that) is chosen, "Paypal Id" for the vendor will be mandatory.

 

The process will be like SAP-PAypal (XiPay)-Vendor Bank. We know that we process a payment in SAP in created a file, that will be XML, which is the format accepted by XiPAy. Do you know if we received a file back to SAP as it has been done successfully?

 

Our client is doing around 12000 payments/month to the vendors....Any idea about bank reconciliation?

 

Doe this implementation affects in some way to house banks and payment cockpit? how? what should be taken into account?

 

I apologize for the inconvenience.

 

I look forward to hearing from you very soon.

 

Thank you very much in advance.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Javier Peris Molina

Collection Management SAP standard functionality is showing Arrears i.e. OVERDUE_BY as negative values

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

When executing TCODE : UDM_SUPERVISOR or UDM_SPECIALIST, In the collections Management module the worklist which is driven by SAP standard functionality is showing the open invoices which are due for payment along with the past dues i.e.Arrears column " OVERDUE_BY" as negative values. But the business requirement is to only display those invoices which are for past dues and not which is due for payment.

Any OSS notes for this to correct this?. Are there any BADI's or Enahancements to delete or exclude this from displaying as negative "arrears" Overdue_by in TCODE: UDM_SUPERVISOR or UDM_SPECIALIST.

 

Arrears with negative values1.jpg

Thanking you in Advance,

Sri M

Change Default Value Notes Changed As Of In FSCM Process Receivables Screen Notes Tab

$
0
0

Hi,

 

In the notes tab of the FSCM Process Receivables screen (transaction UDM_SPECIALIST/UDM_SUPERVISOR), all notes are shown for the previous month. The default date in the 'Notes Changed As Of' field is one month from today's date.

 

Is it possible to change this default date to go back say three months?

We have activated parameter ID's FDM_CCT_CINCE and FDM_PAYMENTS_SINCE in transaction SU3 'maintain user profile' for users and this has allowed us to change the default date to three months ago in the customer contacts tab and payments tab.

I am aware there was a thread open on this in 2014 however the solution given is not working for us.https://scn.sap.com/thread/3553423 Parmeter ID FDM_CCT_SINCE allows you to change the default date on the customer contacts tab but not on the notes tab.

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Niall


Cleared items appearing in UDM_Specialist

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I have already gone though the SCN but could not find any root cause for this. We have few customers which are cleared and does not appear as open items in FBL5N, but are showing up in UDM_Specialist worklist.

 

Please advise.

 

Thanks

 

Zahid

BAPI BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST failing after EHP 7 upgrade

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have a major problem with BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST which is failing after the EHP 7 upgrade.

 

The design is that in the third party system, users claim for credit card expenses. Through interface, it is sent to SAP for posting (via BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST) which creates accounting documents in SAP.

 

We have a custom transaction which records all posting failures. The error here is : Tax code 7OCA00 does not appear in any G/L account item;

But the tax code used in 7O CAQC.

 

Please share your comments and help us resolve this case.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Regards,

Akash Prekar

Auto Dispute Creation programRFDM3000

$
0
0

Hi

 

How can we enhance the selection criteria in program RFDM3000. We want to add the days in arrears in the selection screen as our requirement is to create the dispute case automatically for all the invoices, which are overdue for 30 days.

 

Kind regards


Farhan

MIRO Post parked document.

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

I can't  post specific parked document using MIRO. and no error returned, It's just load and then nothing happen.

 

Regards.

EHP 5 - Credit managment without XI or PI

$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

 

Statement:    In EHP 5 FSCM Credit management can do the credit worthiness checks and credit commitment updates without depending on XI or PI. 

 

Can someone explain me IN DETAIL how does the system do credit worthiness checks and credit commitment updates without PI integration in EHP 5?

 

What is the process to be followed to achieve above ?

 

Thanks

 

Regards,

Meenakshi.N

 

Edited by: Meenakshi.Nakshatrula on Oct 12, 2011 7:34 AM

Viewing all 217 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>