Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP Financials - Financial Supply Chain Management
Viewing all 217 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Same Items showing up in collection worklist everyday

April 30, 2012, 1:44 pm
$
0
0

We generate worklist on daily basis.

 

I recently came across the issue that some of the worklist items are appearing on daily basis regardless of no activity on customer account.

 

When we analyzed the items, we noticed that items that has open promise to pay are showing up on worklist.

 

our collection strategies consist of collection rule for number of due days and amount rules which are being hit for the customer account that has promise to pay created.

 

Is it std. behaviour of the system that even after sucessfull customer contact that results in promise to pay or dispute case, items will re-appear in the worklist again next time when worklist is re-generated if there is an open promise to pay or open dispute case ?

 

Please guide how to over come this issue.

 

Thanks,

Tito

↧
Search

External reference field is not in define default value FDM_CUST01

August 3, 2015, 12:06 pm
$
0
0

We have the requirement to add one more external reference field with the accounting document number. I saw some notes where we can select 3 external fields. But i didn't find that in configuration.

 

Please help me to configure one more external field with default value of accounting document number.

↧
↧

Treatment of premature 51A in FSCM

August 3, 2015, 10:30 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

How can I close premature Fixed Deposits with booking of partial flow and manual interest.

 

Regards

↧

Integration of FSCM Credit Management with DBM

August 4, 2015, 11:26 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We have a requirement to integrate DBM 800 with FSCM credit management to carry out the credit checks. The requirement is to carry out the checks at sales order level. The checks should be configured at order type level.

 

As per the standard setup, we can carry out the checks at Order control level (i.e a check can be configured at service order or vehicle order or parts order level.)

 

 

We have to carry out check below the Order control level i.e at order type level. Any idea how can we achieve this using SAP standard configuration?

 

Capture_DBM.JPG

 

Thanks,

Bhavik Shah

↧

Business Partner as a prerequisite in Basic / Collection Rules

July 31, 2015, 3:16 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have been looking at the BADI's that comes with the customizing in SPRO.

I have a rule where I want to integrate business partner as a prerequisite (GPART).

 

The documentation for this BADI is quite limited so I wanted to know if anyone has done the same as the above and

how you solved it or if you could refer to relevant documentation.

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

Peter

↧
↧

FSCM-Credit Management How to set Credit Limit (Payment term + Amount)?

August 3, 2015, 7:40 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

This is with reference to SAP FSCM – Credit Management Credit limit check on the following combination:

 

  1. Credit Segment : Z001:- Credit Segment
  2. Amount: 100,000 USD
  3. Payment term:- Z001:- 30 Days due date

 

Can you please confirm is it possible to achieve?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Best Regards,

 

MSU

↧

Cost Element and Valuation Class

July 31, 2015, 10:56 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have a situation where a RAW project material had a Valuation class for consumables (3001). We found the material was assigned the wrong valuation class and we change the class appropriately to 3000. This process included deleting lines from POs and scrapping the material out of the system via 551 then bringing the material back via 552 after making the change.

 

To our dismay, the material's cost value is still in the consumable account instead of the raw account.

 

We have changed hundreds of materials in this fashion and this is the first time the value did not move to the appropriate account.

 

cost.png

 

Maybe we're just missing a step. Please help.

 

Jonathan Danson

↧

Cleared Invoices appearing in FBL5N but not visible in UDM_Dispute

August 6, 2015, 5:20 am
$
0
0

Hello, We have a scenario wherein some cleared invoices are visible in FBL5N. However while chekcing in UDM_dispute, by following FIobjects-add customer disputed objects. Then we click on cleared items, then we could see most of the cleared invoices, but one or specific invoices. I have compared those invoices with the invoices which are visible in UDM_dispute but could not find any difference. Now my query is: 1) Why is that some cleared invoices alone not visible in UDM_Dispute? 2) What can be done to reflect the same 3) Whether any mistake is done at user end Thanks in advance Regards Karthick

↧
Search

Integration of ECC 6.0 and FSCM

August 6, 2015, 9:37 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are facing an issue in integration of ECC 6.0 and FSCM. As per the configuration guide provided by SAP, CreditWorthinessQuery_Out should be mapped to CreditWorthinessQuery_In.

 

We have downloaded the standard content provided by SAP from the service marketplace. However the mapping between CreditWorthinessQuery_Out and CreditWorthinessQuery_In is missing in the standard content.

 

 

We are on Enhancement package 7 for ECC.

 

We have raised a OSS message with SAP and are waiting for their inputs.

 

Have you encountered any such issue during your implementation and what was the resolution?

 

Thanks!!

 

Best Regards,

Bhavik Shah

↧
↧

FSCM-DM mapping fields SRMPROTOCOL-POID_ID and SCMG_T_CASE_ATTR-CASE_GUID

August 7, 2015, 4:08 am
$
0
0

HI FSCM-developers

we want to select table SRMPROTOCOL in delta-mode with POID_ID and TIMESTAMP. 

The problem now is: how can we translate (map)  the values of field POID_ID in table SRMPROTOCOL to the values of field CASE_GUID in table SCMG_T_CASE_ATTR, so we can also select MasterData. There should be some tables to map CASE_GUID and  POID_ID and vice versa.

Any Idea?

Thank you in advance

Norb

↧

XML download problem biller direct

August 7, 2015, 5:44 am
$
0
0

Hi

we have a web java biller direct 7.01 SP7 connected to abap system that we have recently upgraded to EHP7 .

After this upgrade we can't do the download of a bill through BD in XML format.

We have the following error:

 

[EXCEPTION]

{0}#1#com.sap.fin.fscmbase.ZipDownloadException: There is a problem when creati                  ng a ZIP archive for the bill details. In the back-end system error "Banca inesistente" has occurred (error code: "BF00" "211"). See also SAP Note 787373.

        at com.sap.fin.fscmbase.BillingDocumentAction.checkForErrors(BillingDocu                  mentAction.java:1076)

        at com.sap.fin.fscmbase.BillingDocumentAction.getZipDataFromR3(BillingDo                  cumentAction.java:1033)

        at com.sap.fin.fscmbase.BillingDocumentAction.doZipR3XmlDisplay(BillingD                  ocumentAction.java:913)

        at com.sap.fin.fscmbase.BillingDocumentAction.doDisplay(BillingDocumentA                  ction.java:408)

        at com.sap.fin.fscmbase.BillingDocumentAction.execute(BillingDocumentAct                  ion.java:123)

        at com.sap.fin.webbase.framework.B2BWebAction.executeJarmed(B2BWebAction         

 

We did some analysys in configuration XCM

http://ZZZ:1111/bd/admin/xcm/compConfig.do   

but everything seems ok (immagine.png):

 

I've also verified the 787373 note regarding:

"Special section: Message Code

 

logmsg.con.secstr.error: This error occurs if the encrypted password of the pool user can no longer be read from the data base. This can occur, for example, after you upgrade the SAP NetWeaver J2EE application server. Overwrite the connection manager password in the XCM and save the settings again. The error should no longer occur."

 

But didn't solve the problem.

 

Any idea?

Thanks

Nick

↧

How to add credit memo order in linked object Dispute case.

August 9, 2015, 12:46 am
$
0
0

Dear FSCM expert, Can you please suggest how can we link a credit memo order to the dispute case linked object? I would like to know any table where adding the object will link the order. We would like to add it by some badi or exit. We assume that, there will be a table where we insert the order key, will make it visible under linked object, in any of these folder.

 

linked object.png

Thanks a lot for your suggestion.

Regards,

Subham

↧

External reference field is not in define default value FDM_CUST01

August 3, 2015, 12:06 pm
$
0
0

We have the requirement to add one more external reference field with the accounting document number. I saw some notes where we can select 3 external fields. But i didn't find that in configuration.

 

Please help me to configure one more external field with default value of accounting document number.

↧
↧

FSCM Segment is blocked

December 13, 2015, 9:14 am
$
0
0

Hi Guru,

I am having an issue in production system, one of the batch job is failing, with Segment is Blocked for collection worklist.

I have checked T-Code UDM_PRMON, and I have tried to stop the run I'd and I did try to delete  UT still I am getting an error. RUN I'd is active.

I have checked the table as well and also executed the parallel processing in background and foreground bit still no luck.

Can someone help me to resolve this issue.

 

Thanks,

Nas

↧

Old Open items (October 2015) not appearing in UDM_SPECIALIST

December 13, 2015, 10:28 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

When simulating UDM_STRATEGY for BP 123456, I am getting the below message.

 

Collection rule ZR00000001 does not apply.

(Here 2 rules are set Collection Rule: ZR00000001 = Risk Category TPC , TPR , TP1 , CTP (Valuation Points 0, Exit Rule Indicator Checked))

                              Collection Rule: ZR00000001 = Risk Category BKR , REI , CAA , RAO (Valuation Points 60, Exit Rule Indicator Not Checked))

 

No worklist items created since exit rule CR00000008 applies

(Here CR00000008 = Amount to be collected between 9.999.999,00- and 500,00 USD, (Valuation Points 0, Exit Rule Indicator Checked)

 

No worklist items created since no rules apply

 

Business partner has no priority according to strategy Z_ABC_CORP

 

I executed, FDM_COLL_SEND01 and it shows 4 items sent as there were 4 open items. 1 overdue and other 3 not due.

The open item is overdue with amount 676.25 USD for this BP). The Credit management master data states: Risk Category as REI)


Need help on this to understand why is the system not showing in UDM_SPECIALIST. I have attached the All Rules.txt file for ready reference. Thanks in advance.

↧
Search

Spanish tax report S_ALR_87012403, customer data missing in the file

December 14, 2015, 7:16 am
$
0
0

Hello,

I am running tax report s_alr_87012403 report and the file is created but customer data doesnt appear in the file created.

The vendors appear correctly and with all the information but the lines related to the customers are mainly blank

Could you please help us with this issue?

Thanks!

↧

Workflow will be triggered to multiple credit analysists

December 15, 2015, 3:17 am
$
0
0

Dear all.

 

We need multiple credit analysis t at the same time they need to release the sales order in FSCM we have created sales order and it is giving the error message that credit limit has been exceed now the order has been blocked we want to trigger the  workflow for multiple credit analysis ts i have maintained two BP in BP master record(credit management) these two are created as employees with either of the persons id Dispute  case is creating    at a time not for both ids is there any group concept for  credit analysists if one person is not available another person can release the credit block

 

mail is generating for both BP(Credit analysis ts) but this case id is with one credit anyalysist id

 

we need more than one credit analysis t when the sale order or delivery generate a block due to the credit limit exceded

 

can any expert revert on this

 

thanks&regards,

Madhav.

↧
↧

SAP FSCM - Credit Limit Check

December 8, 2015, 7:23 am
$
0
0

Dear All,

 

We have relationships maintained in the BP for the Higher and Lower Level, in general when sales order gets created for this combination the limit will be  checked overall and utilized accordingly. in case if the overall limit is fully Utilized then the sales order will be blocked but


We have requirement to block the sales order in case any overdue exist for  any one BP for the above combination , irrespective of higher or lower level relationship. The Sales order should get blocked inspite of the overall limit still available for that relationship combination.

 

As per the below example inspite of 8L overall limit exist as on 02.12.2015 still the sales order should get Blocked as there is an overdue for one of the relationship BP i.e BP1B as on 01.12.2015

 

For Ex:

Business Partner

Credit Limit

Sales Orders Created with the payment  01/12/2015

Payment Cleared as on 01.12.2015

Sales Order created as on 02/12/2015

BP1 – Higher Level

5L

5L

5L

1L using BP1 -  this should block as there is a Overdue item in this relation inspite of 8L overall Limit still exist

BP1A – Lower Level

2L

2L

2L

 

BP1B – Lower Level

3L

1L

Over Due

 

BP1C – lower Level

1L

1L

1L

50 Thousand using BP1C : This also should block as there is a Overdue item in this relation inspite of 8L overall Limit still exist

Total

11L

 

 

 

 

Regards,

Reenu John

↧

what is letter of credit in SAP

December 16, 2015, 3:31 am
$
0
0

I should know the process of Letter of Credit for Vendor paymnets

↧

Accrual & Deferral during Legacy Data Transfer

December 16, 2015, 3:37 am
$
0
0

Dears,

 

In TRM, Is there is a T.code same as TBB1_LC but for Accrual and deferral to make posted status for the accruals till certain date

 

my example as below:

 

Loan Start Term: 11.05.2015

Loan End Term:  26.01.2016

 

Balance cutoff date: 30.11.2015

 

After uploading the Contracts i can make flow 11.05.2015 as posted, can i make the same for Accrual flows till date 30.11.2015

 

If not, could you please assist in knowing the process for accrual and deferral opening balance upload regarding the flows.

 


Regards,

Ahmed Samir

↧
Viewing all 217 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>